562 - (FREE TO READ) Mailbox: "Slap kick man" (VIDEOS)
Readers send in videos of knife threats in lawless Britain - but is all as it seems?
Copyright © 2025 by Jeth Randolph
All Rights Reserved.
No part of this work may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the author.
Third-party information and viewpoints do not represent my personal views or work. This is not legal advice. This content is purely educational and does not advocate for breaking any laws. Do not break any laws or regulations. Consult with your solicitor (Whether they have a black belt or not).
“Slap kick man”
This was the first video I got sent by a couple of readers (Thank you!):
Based on this alone, good distraction slap and a roundhouse ball of foot kick (much neglected in people’s training) to the liver/chest ?
Good response to a hand in pocket encroachment too.
It takes confidence and the will to do it though, so it’s a less likely response for an average person viewing this.
There’s quite a weight difference between the two as well which will help.
The kick doesn’t seem that hard, but his structure was compromised, possible liver shot and perhaps a mentality of trying to play victim by lying on the floor and waiting for victim compensation to swoop in on angel wings? That’s a lot of vapes and weed dude!
The “Hood” seems mentally unprepared for an actually fight perhaps expecting and relying on the fear of a possible knife or actual knife. Mental rug pulled?
As soon as the threat is down, the two individuals leave fast to seemingly seek safety and then call police and report their completely random victimisation in broad daylight.
This was the second video I was sent:
From a channel called “Black belt barrister”, who states that “I'm a Barrister of England and Wales” and also, I’m guessing… a black belt in something.
This one is a whopping 16 minutes long and focuses on the use of force shown in the first video above.
Now interestingly, as I said before this video only focuses on the slap and the kick and the immediate scenario they are contained in and I would agree with this man’s take on it being seemingly justifiable and proportionate self defence given the context of being approached by someone who is displaying physical tells of having a knife and wishing to harm you. Not sure it needed 16 minutes but hey…
“But one more thing… something still puzzles me…”
Why were these two men selected? Is this what happens to everyone in the UK the second they step out of their dwelling place to traverse the dangerous streets?
I’m ignorant as to who this guy (the one taking the video as well as his martially able side kick - see what I did there?) is and did as superficial a dig as humanly possible as I would like to keep it that way.
This could perhaps, be seen as a deceptive video as it presents a lawless partial reality to a viewer seeing it and forming passive worldviews on social media.
The fuller length video (37 mins - See below) of which this incident was part of, shows something quite different.
There’s the Ewetube influencer (this word is key here as well I think, but I’ll get to that later) and he walks around places where he doesn’t appear to live with a phone up filming people that walk past and making comments. Choices in this video for filming seem to be homeless people drinking, street youths and anyone that seems to look different (there’s a goth/punk couple that walk past at one point).
You know, all the stuff that an average person would try and avoid as part of having basic street sense.
He then acts confused when there is hostility towards him as it’s framed by him as friendly rather than the disrespect that it is and he then plays the part of victim.
He has paid another man to protect him while doing this - the fore mentioned “Slap kick man”.
I would have had more respect for him being a wanker if he was actually willing to stick his neck out, start problems AND then sort them himself while filming, that might have been at least some good popcorn viewing but instead we get this sad male version of the gobby girlfriend that likes to start fights with men and then salivates and gets off as her tough boyfriend beats anyone who steps up or disrespects her.
The comments section of his 652K subscribers on one channel alone are filled with similar gamma male adulation.
The only real lessons I can see here is that the energy you put out is (to a certain extent) the energy you get back.
And the universe is in harmony grasshopper.
It’s not self defence to walk around goading people with your “right to film” in order to actively get a negative response and content, it’s a weird inversion of the predatory street behaviour he claims to be documenting!
As for the “barrister with the black belt” holding up his trousers (or perhaps his viewing figures), he should have seen and mentioned that and it’s a odd that he doesn’t as any barrister worth his or her not inconsiderable salary would tear you a new one in court with access to the full video of your behaviour preceding the incident.
Full video:
I mentioned earlier the word “influencer”. I’d seen a soundbite from a recent interview this individual did where he mentions the UK being on the verge of serious sectarian violence and unrest. It’s interesting to see his choice of video uploads in view of this claimed opinion too. But that content just keeps on coming doesn’t it? And somehow in an environment so hostile to free speech and reckless social media posting too.
His bio states: “Mathematical sentience complex trapped inside an over-clocked ape graphics card brain. A living man can be enslaved and reduced to the historic condition of an object. But if he dies in refusing to be enslaved, he reaffirms the existence of another kind of human nature which refuses to be classified as an object. -Albert Camus”
He also has an interesting background of working with media corporations on thought crime subjects and then showing the audience the error of such thinking:
https://www.gmss.uk/events/the-conspiracy-theorist-who-changed-his-mind
Some might sniff a rat with such a background.
I wouldn't know though and care little to find out.
Media personalities like these seem unlikely to make anything better with their contributions either, but that of course, is not their job.
Thank you to the journal readers that sent in these videos.
This one perhaps seems closer to the partial truth:
